Our Experiences With The Peak Water Jug

Singapore’s tap water is moderately soft and safe to drink directly. It is possible to brew decent coffees without filter as well. When we received the Peak, our team of 5 did a little activity to experience the effects of the Peak Water. 

Water analysis

We tested the tap water with the provided test stripe. Results showed that our tap water was relatively low,  and we only needed to filter our water via the Peak on setting 2. 

We first took pH, hardness and TDS readings on 3 different water sources - brew bar (BB), unfiltered water, tap water filtered with Peak. Hardness and TDS levels dropped significantly after the tap water was filtered via the Peak, and the numbers were similar to BB. pH levels remained at 7 (neutral) throughout. 

Test taste
We also did a blind cupping with three different water using a familiar coffee, Suke Quto. We then ranked the coffee in order of preference. These preferences were formed on the basis quality of acidity, mouthfeel, and flavour clarity. 
The results showed that there was a tie between water from BB and Peak Water.  It was a common consensus that the cup brewed with unfiltered water had dull and short flavours. Acidity was also significantly muted as compared to others. 

Further tests

We were also inspired by James Hoffman where in his video, his comparisons included coffees with different processing methods. We then conducted a second test consisting of only tap water and tap water filtered with Peak Water. We also changed our coffees to an Ethiopian natural  and Kenyan full-washed. 

Interestingly, the difference in quality was more obvious with the Kenyan than the Ethiopian. With the Peak water, the Kenyan was distinctively juicer - with a medium to medium-high intensity and having a lively quality. The Kenyan brewed with tap water was lacking in flavour clarity as well. 

Interestingly with the Ethiopian coffee, the contrast in quality only showed as the coffee cooled down. When it was hot, both cups had their own strength. The cup brewed with tap water had very good aromatics while the cup brewed with Peak Water had high sweetness. 

As the coffees cooled down more, the Ethiopian with tap water began to lose structure. The cup brewed with Peak Water had a smoother and cleaner mouthfeel while the cup brewed with tap water had lighter body with some dry aftertaste. The flavour experience was also shorter with the tap water than with the Peak Water. 

Limitations 

Our experiences seemed to suggest that the Peak Water is very useful in highlighting a coffee’s acidity and also tactility. However all these are very simple exercises and basic findings. There are still a lot more variables that have yet to be explored. 

Cupping is merely a method to compare coffees to reduce variability and calibration errors. Paired with different brewing devices and different coffees, there is still a wide range of outcomes that could happen and for the Peak to perform differently. Furthermore, in this initial testing, we’ve yet to taste the outcomes where we filter our tap water on the other settings available. 

Overview
Overall, we feel that you could still get decent coffees brewed with regular tap water, however it is still very much subjected to your location and water source. The Peak Water is definitely to go for if you’re finding your home brews to be tasting heavy and dull.

Written by Shi Li Lim

More stories

Why Peak Water? (I)

Water quality is essential in making a better cup of coffeeCoffee is made of 98% water. Great coffee needs great water to begin with. Water qualit...